Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Oklahoma /Cases /Supreme Court of Oklahoma /

2016

212 Supreme Court of Oklahoma opinions from 2016.

  • Nelson v. Enid Medical Associates, Inc. 376 P.3d 212, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF GILL 376 P.3d 200, (Okla. 2016)
  • MAREE v. NEUWIRTH 374 P.3d 750, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF GILL 2016 OK 61, (Okla. 2016)
  • MAREE v. NEUWIRTH 2016 OK 62, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF WAGNON 373 P.3d 1013, (Okla. 2016)
  • LOGAN COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT v. PLEASANT OAKS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 2016 OK 65, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF WAGNON 2016 OK 66, (Okla. 2016)
  • Logan County Conservation District v. Pleasant Oaks Homeowners Ass'n 374 P.3d 755, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION 2016 OK 64, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION 2016 OK 63, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN RE INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 403, STATE QUESTION NO. 779 2016 OK 59, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 5 OF RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO PRACTICE OF LAW 2016 OK 60, (Okla. 2016)
  • STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. O'LAUGHLIN 373 P.3d 1005, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF DUKE 382 P.3d 501, (Okla. 2016)
  • STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. O'LAUGHLIN 2016 OK 56, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF DUKE 2016 OK 58, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN RE AMENDMENT OF RULE 5 OF RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO PRACTICE OF LAW 2016 OK 57, (Okla. 2016)
  • AMERICAN BIOMEDICAL GROUP, INC. v. TECHTROL, INC. 374 P.3d 820, (Okla. 2016)
  • AMERICAN BIOMEDICAL GROUP, INC. v. TECHTROL, INC. 2016 OK 55, (Okla. 2016)
  • STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. REDD 2016 OK 53, (Okla. 2016)
  • REVOCATION OF CREDENTIALS OF REGISTERED COURTROOM INTERPRETERS 2016 OK 52, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN RE AMENDMENT TO RULES GOVERNING ADMISSION TO PRACTICE OF LAW 2016 OK 54, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN RE INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 409, STATE QUESTION NO. 785 376 P.3d 250, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN RE INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 409, STATE QUESTION NO. 785 2016 OK 51, (Okla. 2016)
  • STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LEWIS 371 P.3d 1099, (Okla. 2016)
  • STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LEWIS 2016 OK 48, (Okla. 2016)
  • REVOCATION OF CERTIFICATES OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS 2016 OK 49, (Okla. 2016)
  • REINSTATEMENT OF CERTIFICATES OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS 2016 OK 50, (Okla. 2016)
  • LOYD v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC. 371 P.3d 488, (Okla. 2016)
  • MURLIN v. PEARMAN 371 P.3d 1094, (Okla. 2016)
  • MURLIN v. PEARMAN 2016 OK 47, (Okla. 2016)
  • LOYD v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC. 2016 OK 46, (Okla. 2016)
  • STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. GOERKE 374 P.3d 819, (Okla. 2016)
  • STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. GOERKE 2016 OK 45, (Okla. 2016)
  • DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES v. BRUCE 371 P.3d 484, (Okla. 2016)
  • ALLEN v. HARRISON 374 P.3d 812, (Okla. 2016)
  • ROBINSON v. FAIRVIEW FELLOWSHIP HOME FOR SENIOR CITIZENS, INC. 371 P.3d 477, (Okla. 2016)
  • ROBINSON v. FAIRVIEW FELLOWSHIP HOME FOR SENIOR CITIZENS, INC. 2016 OK 42, (Okla. 2016)
  • DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES v. BRUCE 2016 OK 43, (Okla. 2016)
  • ALLEN v. HARRISON 2016 OK 44, (Okla. 2016)
  • MAXWELL v. SPRINT PCS 369 P.3d 1079, (Okla. 2016)
  • PIERSON v. JOPLIN 2016 OK 40, (Okla. 2016)
  • MAXWELL v. SPRINT PCS 2016 OK 41, (Okla. 2016)
  • IN THE MATTER OF M.A.P.W. 2016 OK 39, (Okla. 2016)
  • Williams v. State ex rel. Department of Human Services 369 P.3d 1078, (Okla. 2016)
  • DANI v. MILLER 374 P.3d 779, (Okla. 2016)
  • SCOCOS v. SCOCOS 369 P.3d 1068, (Okla. 2016)
  • STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. OLIVER 369 P.3d 1074, (Okla. 2016)
  • SCOCOS v. SCOCOS 2016 OK 36, (Okla. 2016)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑