Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1976

State v. Gunberg

State v. Gunberg
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided August 2, 1976 · Fort, Langtry, Schwab
26 Or. App. 357; 552 P.2d 268; 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1710

State v. Gunberg

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Counsel have stipulated:

"It appearing to counsel for appellant and respondent herein that defendant-appellant’s sentence as a dangerous offender is erroneous, in that the judgment order herein imposes an additional sentence for being a dangerous offender, instead of enhancing the sentence for the underlying offenses:
"IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between counsel for appellant and respondent that the judgment herein should be vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.”

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.