State v. Gunberg
State v. Gunberg
26 Or. App. 357; 552 P.2d 268; 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 1710
State v. Gunberg
Opinion of the Court
Counsel have stipulated:
"It appearing to counsel for appellant and respondent herein that defendant-appellant’s sentence as a dangerous offender is erroneous, in that the judgment order herein imposes an additional sentence for being a dangerous offender, instead of enhancing the sentence for the underlying offenses:
"IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between counsel for appellant and respondent that the judgment herein should be vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.”
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.