State v. David
Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. David, 26 Or. App. 359 (1976)
552 P.2d 272
Fort, Langtry, Schwab
State v. David
Opinion of the Court
Counsel have stipulated:
"It appearing to counsel for appellant and respondent herein that defendant-appellant’s sentence as a dangerous offender is erroneous, in that the judgment order herein imposes an additional sentence for being a dangerous offender, instead of enhancing the sentence for the underlying offense:
"IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between counsel for appellant and respondent that the judgment herein should be vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.”
Reversed and remanded.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE OF OREGON v. PETER DAVID, JR.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published