State v. Fondren

Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Fondren, 568 P.2d 721 (1977)
30 Or. App. 1045; 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 1772
Schwab, Tanzer, Richardson

State v. Fondren

Opinion

*1047 PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from an order suppressing contraband — marihuana and peyote — seized from the defendant’s automobile. As the trial judge found, the police had probable cause to think that defendant’s automobile contained the contraband. The police, without a warrant, seized the automobile which was on the parking lot maintained by defendant’s employer for employes, and had it towed to the police garage. The police thereafter obtained a search warrant.

The trial judge held that in addition to probable cause, exigent circumstances to seize or search an operable automobile must exist before such can be done without a warrant. This was error. See State v. Greene, 30 Or App 1019, 568 P2d 716 (1977).

Reversed and remanded.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. GARY LEE FONDREN, Respondent
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published