State v. Dixon
State v. Dixon
31 Or. App. 1027; 571 P.2d 922; 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2864
State v. Dixon
Opinion of the Court
Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that his defense was prejudiced by the state’s failure to comply with the discovery statute, ORS 135.815, and that therefore his conviction for prostitution should be reversed. Not only did defendant not make a record of any specific prejudice, he did not request discovery in accordance with the discovery statute, ORS 135.845.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.