Maddox v. STATE ACC. INS. FUND
Maddox v. STATE ACC. INS. FUND
605 P.2d 1391; 44 Or. App. 520; 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2407
(Pacific Reporter, Second Series)
Maddox v. STATE ACC. INS. FUND
Opinion
In the matter of the Compensation of Charles MADDOX, Claimant, Respondent,
v.
STATE Accident Insurance Fund, Petitioner.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Darrell E. Bewley, Associate Counsel, State Acc. Ins. Fund, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were K.R. Maloney, Chief Counsel, and James A. Blevins, Chief Trial Counsel, State Acc. Ins. Fund, Salem.
David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Dye & Olson, Salem.
Before SCHWAB, C.J., and RICHARDSON and ROBERTS, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. James v. SAIF, 44 Or. App. 405, 605 P.2d 1368 (1980).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.