Spray v. Board of Medical Examiners
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Miller v. Board of Psychologist Examiners (Or. Ct. App. 2004)
- Cochran v. Board of Psychologist Examiners (Or. Ct. App. 2000)
- Sachdev v. Or. Med. Bd. (Or. Ct. App. 2018)
- Read v. OREGON MEDICAL BOARD (Or. Ct. App. 2011)
- Morgan v. Board of Dentistry (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
- McKay v. Board of Medical Examiners (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
- De St. Germain v. Employment Division (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
- Trebesch v. Employment Division (Or. Ct. App. 1984)
- Brady v. Bureau of Labor and Industries (Or. Ct. App. 1982)
- Britton v. Board of Podiatry Examiners (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
- Gambee v. Oregon Medical Board (Or. Ct. App. 2014)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Both parties have petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in Spray v. Bd. of Medical Examiners, 50 Or App 311, 624 P2d 125 (1981). Rule 10.10, Rules of Appellate Procedure. The petition of petitioner Spray is denied. The petition of respondent Board of Medical Examiners (Board) is granted, and our former opinion is modified in the manner described below.
In our opinion in Spray, 50 Or App at 326-329, we held that the Board’s meeting to decide Dr. Spray’s case should have been open to the public. That was error. ORS 192.690 provides, in pertinent part,
"(1) [The Open Meetings Law] shall not apply to deliberations * * * of state agencies conducting hearings on contested cases in accordance with the provisions of [the Administrative Procedures Act], the review of the Workers’ Compensation Board of similar hearings on contested cases, or to any judical proceeding.” (Emphasis supplied.)
Chir former opinion is modified accordingly. In all other respects, our former opinion is affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.