Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. School District No. 40
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
- Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. (Or. 1981)
- Southern Pacific Transporation Co. v. School District No. 40 (Or. 1981)
- Fisher v. Huck (Or. Ct. App. 1981)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Trans., 50 Or App 561, 624 P2d 162 (1981).
Campbell, J. Pro Tempore, vice Young, J.
Young, J., not participating.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting in part.
For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Espinosa v. Southern Pacific Trans., 50 Or App 561, 624 P2d 162 (1981),I also dissent from the holding in the present case that the school district’s liability is limited by ORS 30.270 when the district has available insurance which exceeds the liability limits of that statute.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.