Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1982

State v. Neal

State v. Neal
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided September 8, 1982 · Buttler, Rossman, Warren
59 Or. App. 129; 650 P.2d 187; 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 3789

State v. Neal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant assigns three errors on this appeal from his conviction for rape. First, he contends that his 20-year sentence, with the requirement that he serve a minimum of 10 years before being considered for parole, is cruel and unusual punishment. It is not.

In the second and third, he contends the trial court erred in refusing to provide a transcript on appeal at public expense. We find no error. SER Acocella v. Allen, 288 Or 175, 604 P2d 391 (1979).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.