McKnight v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon
McKnight v. Land Conservation & Development Commission, 687 P.2d 170 (1984)
69 Or. App. 642; 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 4095
Gillette, P.J., and Van Hoomissen and Young

McKnight v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Opinion

*643 PER CURIAM

Petitioners seek a ruling under ORS 183.400 that respondent’s temporary rule OAR 660-14-000 is invalid. That rule became effective on July 20, 1983, and was replaced on December 30, 1983, by OAR 660-14-000 through 660-14-040, which are permanent rules. The rule petitioners attack is no longer in existence, and our decision would “merely resolve an abstract question without practical effect.” State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Holland, 290 Or 765, 767, 625 P2d 1318 (1981). To the extent that the rule may affect petitioners’ rights in other cases, they may renew their attacks in those cases. This case, however, is moot, and we therefore dismiss the petition.

Petition for judicial review dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
McKNIGHT Et Al, Petitioners, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Respondent
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published