State v. Bradshaw

Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Bradshaw, 66 Or. App. 585 (1984)
674 P.2d 1190; 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 2618
Gillette, Young

State v. Bradshaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

In State v. Bradshaw, 54 Or App 949, 636 P2d 1011 (1981), rev den 292 Or 568 (1982), we determined that, under Edwards v. Arizona, 451 US 477, 101 S Ct 1880, 68 L Ed 2d 378 (1981), the trial court erred in admitting statements made by the defendant after he had requested an attorney. The United States Supreme Court reversed and remanded. Oregon v. Bradshaw,_US_, 103 S Ct 2830, 77 L Ed 2d 405 (1983).

We denied defendant’s motion to file supplemental briefs and to make additional argument based on Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution. The proffered argument was not made in the trial court. Defendant’s brief raises no other issues. Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision, defendant’s conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE OF OREGON v. JAMES E. BRADSHAW
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published