Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985

State v. Ehrle

State v. Ehrle
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided July 10, 1985 · Gillette, Hoomissen, Young
74 Or. App. 358; 701 P.2d 1056; 1985 Ore. App. LEXIS 3625

State v. Ehrle

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

The state appeals a trial court order that sustained defendant’s demurrer to two indictments for multiple counts of robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415, on the ground that the indictments show on their face that the Statute of Limitations, ORS 131.125(2) (a), had run. The trial court was correct. See State v. Livingston, 73 Or App 551, 699 P2d 1131 (1985).

Affirmed.

Dissenting Opinion

VAN HOOMISSEN, J.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in State v. Livingston, 73 Or App 551, 555, 699 P2d 1131 (1985). See ORS 131.125(2)(a); ORS 131.145(2)(a); ORS 131.135.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.