Brewer v. Erwin
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Ventris (Or. Ct. App. 2002)
- Central Oregon Fabricators, Inc. v. Hudspeth (Or. Ct. App. 2000)
- Averill v. Red Lion (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
- Hay v. Oregon Department of Transportation (Or. 1986)
- Hay v. Department of Transportation (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Defendants petition the Supreme Court for review of our recent opinion clarifying our original decision. Brewer v. Erwin, 70 Or App 709, 690 P2d 1122 (1984). We treat the petition for review as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10(1). We grant the petition and modify our decision to provide that interest on the judgment for plaintiff shall run from October 21, 1980, the date of the original judgment, rather than from June 20, 1980, the date of the jury verdict. ORS 82.010(3). With this modification, we adhere to our previous opinion.
Reconsideration granted; previous opinion adhered to as modified.
Defendants also attack our action in clarifying our original decision, asserting that the issue is not properly before us. Defendants should remember that they petitioned us to clarify the original opinion. It ill behooves them to complain about the outcome when they helped provoke our action.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.