Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards, 85 Or. App. 477 (1987)
737 P.2d 617
Deits, Newman, Richardson

Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards

Opinion of the Court

DEITS, J.

Claimant has filed a petition for review, which we treat as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10. In our opinion, Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards, 84 Or App 127, 733 P2d 113 (1987), we said:

“[The doctor’s] statement that claimant’s injury is permanent only indicates a waxing and waning of symptoms of the chronic condition for which he had received an award.”

We grant reconsideration only to correct a factual error. Petitioner correctly points out that he had not received an award on his claim. As noted in our opinion, 84 Or App at 131, the claim was classified as nondisabling. We still hold that claimant did not perfect' his aggravation claim within the statutory period.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Reference

Full Case Name
In the Matter of the Compensation of Steve Krajacic, KRAJACIC v. BLAZING ORCHARDS
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published