Petitioners seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that found Wilson’s IGA responsible for claimant’s disability and awarded attorney fees to claimant. On de novo review, we agree with the Board that Wilson’s IGA is responsible, because claimant’s work there independently contributed to his disability. 1

Petitioners also challenge the award of attorney fees to claimant on the responsibility issue, contending that claimant is only a nominal party and not entitled to attorney fees for the hearing which was conducted under ORS 656.307. 2 Although attorney fees are ordinarily not recoverable by a claimant in a responsibility proceeding, Petshow v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co., 76 Or App 563, 569, 710 P2d 781 (1985), rev den 300 Or 722 (1986), he may be entitled to attorney fees if he is “required to appear and participate to avoid a loss of compensation.” Anfora v. Liberty Communications, 88 Or App 30, 33, 744 P2d 265 (1987). Here, all three insurers conceded the compensability of the claim, and claimant’s right to compensation was not in jeopardy. 3 Furthermore, claimant’s attorney participated with respect to the responsibility issue, at the request of counsel for the insurers, only because the factual background to be elicited through claimant’s answers to his attorney’s questions would be identical to that required for claimant’s permanent partial disability claim, which was being considered in the same proceeding. 4 Claimant’s attorney *67 therefore did not participate meaningfully with respect to the responsibility issue. Claimant is not entitled to attorney fees for the responsibility proceeding.

Reversed as to award to claimant of attorney fees for responsibility hearing; otherwise affirmed.