Hoffmann v. Stoll

Court of Appeals of Oregon January 13, 1988

Hoffmann v. Stoll, 89 Or. App. 258 (1988)

748 P.2d 180

Deits, Newman, Richardson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or App 340, 717 P2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or 155 (1986).

Newman, J., dissenting.

Dissenting Opinion

NEWMAN, J.,

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated by Warren, J., in his dissent in Saechao v. Matsakoun, 78 Or App 340, 348, 717 P2d 165, rev dismissed 302 Or 155 (1986).

Reference

Full Case Name: HOFFMANN, and ROTH v. STOLL
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published