Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988

Shipp v. Beard

Shipp v. Beard
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided June 15, 1988 · Graber, Hoomissen
91 Or. App. 524; 756 P.2d 57; 1988 WL 60008

Shipp v. Beard

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Employer and its insurance carrier seek review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order. The petition for judicial review was filed on July 24,1987, and we therefore review for substantial evidence. Or Laws 1987, ch 884, § 12a; Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 205, 752 P2d 312 (1988). Because the Board order is inadequate for judicial review under the standards in Armstrong, we remand to the Board for reconsideration.

Remanded for reconsideration.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.