Plaintiffs are children of the decedent. Anita E. Ken-worthy (defendant) is the decedent’s surviving spouse and the personal representative of the decedent’s estate. The Hay-words are other children of the decedent. Plaintiffs and the Haywords were expressly disinherited in the decedent’s will, under which defendant is the sole beneficiary. The complaint purports to combine an action on a rejected claim against the estate and an action for a declaratory judgment that defendant, as personal representative, holds the estate’s assets in trust for intestate distribution. Plaintiffs assert that the will was revoked by the decedent’s marriage to defendant. ORS 112.305.1 The trial court gave defendants a judgment.

This action was filed after the expiration of the statutory four-month limitation for a will contest. ORS 113.075.2 Defendant asserted the limitation in an ORCP 21A motion and raises the denial of that motion as an alternative ground on which to uphold the judgment. Artman v. Ray, 263 Or 529, 501 P2d 63, 502 P2d 1376 (1972). The trial court should have granted the motion. There is no authority, statutory or otherwise, that allows avoidance of the will contest limitation by designating an action as one on a claim or for a declaratory judgment based on purported invalidity of a will. Therefore, we need not reach the issues presented by plaintiffs, because the judgment is correct.

Affirmed.