Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989

State v. Hoveskeland

State v. Hoveskeland
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided November 22, 1989 · Deits, Newman, Richardson
99 Or. App. 486; 782 P.2d 957; 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1926

State v. Hoveskeland

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals her convictions for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, and driving without a valid license. ORS 807.010. She contends that the court erred by denying her motion to suppress evidence that was made on the ground that the officer did not have a reasonable suspicion to support his stop of the vehicle that she was driving. The state concedes that the court erred. We agree.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.