Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1989

State v. Dixon

State v. Dixon
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided December 28, 1989 · Buttler, Rossman, Warren
100 Or. App. 60; 784 P.2d 134; 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 2099

State v. Dixon

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163,160, contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal and in not specifying in the sentencing order the amount of restitution and court-appointed attorney fees that he is required to pay as a condition of suspending imposition of sentence.

The evidence was sufficient to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, his conviction is affirmed.

The state concedes that defendant is correct in stating that the court erred in not specifying the amount of restitution and attorney' fees that he is required to pay. Accordingly, we remand for resentencing.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.