Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990

Korbut v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Korbut v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided March 7, 1990 · No. A8806-03389 CA A60749 · Joseph, C.J., and Riggs and Edmonds
787 P.2d 896 (Pacific Reporter, Second Series)
Korbut v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

787 P.2d 896 (1990)
100 Or.App. 649

Michael KORBUT, Sr., Personal Representative of the Estate of Carolyn Korbut, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
EASTMAN KODAK CO.; Black Corporation; and White Co., Defendants, and Sterling Drug, Inc., Dba Glenbrook Laboratories; and Fred Meyer, Inc., Respondents.

No. A8806-03389; CA A60749.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 7, 1990.
Argued and Submitted February 14, 1990.
Reconsideration Denied April 25, 1990.
Review Denied May 22, 1990.

J. Randolph Pickett, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was J. Randolph Pickett, P.C., Portland.

Jeffrey M. Batchelor, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Laurence F. Janssen, Vivian Raits Solomon, and Spears, Lubersky, Bledsoe, Anderson, Young & Hilliard, Portland; and Robert L. Kaufman, Kathryn M. Forgie, Rebecca D. Wynn and Haight, Brown and Bonesteel, Santa Monica, California.

Before JOSEPH, C.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is a wrongful death action based on defective product allegations. The death occurred in 1982. The action was brought in 1988. The trial court granted defendants a summary judgment on the basis of Eldridge v. Eastmoreland General Hospital, 307 Or. 500, 769 P.2d 775 (1989). We are bound by that decision.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.