Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991

State v. Gert

State v. Gert
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided January 23, 1991 · Edmonds, Riggs, Warren
105 Or. App. 406; 803 P.2d 785; 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 98

State v. Gert

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance under ORS 475.992. Because she did not waive a jury trial in writing, as required by ORS 136.001, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Because the issue will arise on retrial, we have reviewed defendant’s claim that her motion to suppress was erroneously denied. We conclude that the trial court properly denied the motion.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.