Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991

State v. Loehline

State v. Loehline
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided February 13, 1991 · Buttler, Muniz, Rossman
105 Or. App. 623; 804 P.2d 1226; 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 205

State v. Loehline

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

In this civil commitment proceeding, the allegedly mentally ill person assigns as error the trial court’s finding that she knowingly and intelligently refused her right to court appointed counsel. ORS 426.100(3) (d). The trial court never advised her on the record of her right to counsel or made a sufficient inquiry to determine whether she was knowingly and intelligently refusing counsel. We accept the state’s concession that that was error.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.