Scott v. Francis

Court of Appeals of Oregon
Scott v. Francis, 107 Or. App. 766 (1991)
811 P.2d 927; 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1000
Deits, Joseph, Rossman, Warren

Scott v. Francis

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

The Supreme Court granted review in this case and vacated our decisions, 311 Or 151,806 P2d 129 (1991), after it was determined that there had been no final, appealable judgment entered in the trial court. On remand, pursuant to the Supreme Court’s instructions, we granted the trial court leave to enter an appealable judgment. ORS 19.033(4). The trial court entered the judgment, and appellant has filed an amended notice of appeal.

Our opinion, 100 Or App 392, 786 P2d 1269 (1990), as modified on reconsideration, 104 Or App 39, 798 P2d 1111 (1990), is adopted and republished as the opinion of the court.

Reversed and remanded.

Concurring in Part

WARREN, J.,

concurring in part, dissenting in part.

I dissented in part in our original opinion. For the reasons stated there, I concur and dissent in part here.

Joseph, Chief Judge, and Rossman and Deits, Judges, join in this concurring and dissenting opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
Glenn H. SCOTT and Esther Scott v. Peter D. FRANCIS Patrick H. LePley Jack J. Ackerman Francis, Lopez & Lepley and Francis, Lopez & Ackerman, Carl A. Taylor LOPEZ, - and Jay R. JACKSON
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published