State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Oregon
State v. Jones, 111 Or. App. 382 (1992)
826 P.2d 17; 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 378
Deits, Riggs, Rossman

State v. Jones

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Defendant has petitioned for review of our decision. 109 Or App 235, 818 P2d 1286 (1991). Treating the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, we grant reconsideration and withdraw the decision.

On the basis of Wells v. Peterson, 111 Or App 171, 826 P2d 13 (1992), we hold that ORS 161.620 prohibits the imposition of any mandatory prison term on defendant.

Reconsideration allowed; decision withdrawn; convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing on murder conviction.

Dissenting Opinion

ROSSMAN, J.,

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in my dissent in Wells v. Peterson, 111 Or App 171, 175, 826 P2d 13 (1992) (Rossman, J., dissenting), I would reverse defendant’s 10-year mandatory minimum sentence, ORS 163.115(3)(b), as violative of ORS 161.620.1 would affirm the 15-year discretionary minimum sentence that was imposed under ORS 163.115(3)(c).

Deits and Riggs, JJ., join in this dissenting opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE OF OREGON v. JOHN RAY JONES
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published