Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992

State v. Tejeda

State v. Tejeda
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided February 12, 1992 · Deits, Joseph, Richardson
111 Or. App. 398; 826 P.2d 26; 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 329

State v. Tejeda

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Defendant’s probation was revoked, because he had been convicted of possession of cocaine in another case. See State v. Tejeda (A63949), 111 Or App 201, 826 P2d 25 (1992). He contends that he is not guilty of that charge and that, therefore, his probation was improperly revoked. He is wrong.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.