Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994

Akers v. Board of Parole

Akers v. Board of Parole
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided February 2, 1994 · Durham, Edmonds, Tempore, Warren
126 Or. App. 265; 866 P.2d 527; 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 112

Akers v. Board of Parole

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that imposed as a condition of parole that he not have contact with a particular person. He asserts that there is not substantial evidence to support imposition of the condition. We have reviewed the record, including evidence not disclosed to petitioner, and conclude that there is evidence justifying the imposition of the condition. He also challenges the refusal of the Board to disclose to him a letter it considered in imposing the condition. The withholding of the letter was not error. Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331, 862 P2d 1312 (1993).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.