State v. Demalignon
State v. Demalignon
131 Or. App. 259; 884 P.2d 588; 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 1577
State v. Demalignon
Opinion of the Court
Defendant appeals the sentence imposed on his conviction for criminal mischief in the first degree. ORS 164.365. At trial, he objected to the imposition of restitution because the trial court failed to consider defendant’s ability to pay. He assigns error to the sentence of restitution. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing restitution, because it failed to consider defendant’s ability to pay. ORS 137.106(2)(b). We accept the concession and remand for resentencing.
Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.