State v. Murphy
State v. Murphy
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, an allegedly mentally ill person, appeals from a judgment of involuntary civil commitment. ORS 426.130(l)(b)(C). We reverse and remand.
The state concedes that the trial court’s failure to explain to appellant his right to subpoena witnesses under ORS 426.100(1)
In view of our disposition, it is unnecessary to address appellant’s other assignment of error.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
ORS 426.100(1) provides, in part:
“At the time the allegedly mentally ill person is brought before the court, the court shall advise the person of the following:
‘(d) The right to subpoena witnesses!.]
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In the Matter of Donald Murphy, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person. STATE OF OREGON v. DONALD MURPHY
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published