Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1998

Jensen v. Maass

Jensen v. Maass
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided September 2, 1998 · Armstrong, Deits, Edmonds
155 Or. App. 642; 964 P.2d 293; 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 1492

Jensen v. Maass

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Petitioner appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. Our review is limited to errors of law, including whether the facts found by the post- conviction court are supported by the record. Yeager v. Maass, 93 Or App 561, 564, 763 P2d 184 (1988), rev den 307 Or 340 (1989).

Petitioner contends on appeal that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel when his lawyer failed to advise him, before he agreed to a stipulated facts trial, that he could receive consecutive sentences and a gun minimum sentence. Turczynski v. Grill, 134 Or App 351, 895 P2d 787 (1995), establishes that the court properly rejected the claim.

We reject petitioner’s remaining assignments of error without discussion.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.