Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1999

State v. Marcell

State v. Marcell
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided September 22, 1999 · Haselton, Muniz, Wollheim
163 Or. App. 115; 985 P.2d 238; 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1606

State v. Marcell

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

At oral argument the state conceded that none of the alleged predicate offenses could be used to support the racketeering conviction. See State v. Harris, 157 Or App 119, 967 P2d 909 (1998). We accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to vacate judgment.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.