Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000

State v. Peed

State v. Peed
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided May 3, 2000 · Armstrong, Ceniceros, Edmonds
167 Or. App. 156; 999 P.2d 1215; 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 724

State v. Peed

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for several sexual crimes. On appeal, he demurs, for the first time, to counts 1 and 2 on the ground that the indictment fails to state a crime. See State v. Young, 161 Or App 507, 509-12, 985 P2d 835 (1999), rev den 329 Or 590 (2000) (a defendant may demur to the indictment, for failure to state a crime, for the first time on appeal). The state concedes error, and we agree.

Defendant’s other arguments do not require discussion.

Judgments of conviction and sentence on counts 1 and 2 reversed; otherwise affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.