Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- Harris v. Suniga (Or. Ct. App. 2006)
- Haynes v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation (Or. Ct. App. 2003)
- Portland Trailer & Equipment, Inc. v. A-1 Freeman Moving & Storage, Inc. (Or. Ct. App. 2002)
- Potter v. Baxter (Or. Ct. App. 2025)
- Marshall v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (Or. 2023)
- Marshall v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (Or. 2023)
- Cox v. HP Inc. (Or. Ct. App. 2022)
- Diamond Heating, Inc. v. Clackamas County (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
- Marshall v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
- Cerner Middle East Ltd. v. Belbadi Enterprises LLC (Or. Ct. App. 2020)
- PNC Multifamily Capital Institutional Fund XXXIV Ltd. Partnership v. AOH-Regent Ltd. Partnership (Or. Ct. App. 2014)
- O'Neil v. Martin (Or. Ct. App. 2013)
- Ivers v. Salladay (Or. Ct. App. 2012)
- Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. Koresko (Or. Ct. App. 2011)
- Swartsley v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp. (Or. Ct. App. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to ORAP 6.25, defendant Robertson petitions for reconsideration of our opinion, Portland Trailer & Equipment v. A-1 Freeman Moving, 166 Or App 651, 5 P3d 604 (2000), in which we concluded that Oregon courts have personal jurisdiction over defendants pursuant to ORCP 4 L in this action. Defendant Robertson requests that we delete the bracketed language from the following sentences:
“Plaintiffs prevailed in the arbitration proceeding [and were awarded their attorney fees by the arbitrator]. Freeman requested trial de novo but ultimately dismissed the Oklahoma action without prejudice. [Under Oklahoma law, the dismissal effectively deprived plaintiffs of the attorney fees awarded by the arbitrator.]” 166 Or App at 653-54.
Plaintiffs and defendant Freeman have stipulated to the deletion. Therefore, we allow the petition and delete the language that is bracketed above.
Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified and adhered to as modified.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.