Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001

State v. Monaco

State v. Monaco
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided August 29, 2001 · Armstrong, Edmonds, Kistler
176 Or. App. 349; 30 P.3d 1229; 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1268

State v. Monaco

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his convictions for several drug-related offenses. He assigns error only to the trial court’s imposition of 42 months’ probation on count 4, to run consecutively to a prison and post-prison supervision term on a different count. The state concedes that that was error, and we agree. A consecutive probationary sentence is subsumed in a previous sentence that includes post-prison supervision. State v. Dummitt, 115 Or App 487, 839 P2d 246 (1992). We vacate the sentences and remand for resentencing. ORS 138.222(5); State v. Hagan, 140 Or App 454, 916 P2d 317 (1996).

Sentences vacated; remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.