Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006

State v. Cook

State v. Cook
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided January 18, 2006 · Armstrong, Haselton, Rosenblum
203 Or. App. 806; 126 P.3d 754; 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 34

State v. Cook

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder, is unable to provide for his basic personal needs, and is not receiving such care as is necessary for health and safety. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is unable to provide for his basic personal needs. On de novo review, we find the state’s concession to be well founded and, therefore, accept it.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.