Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006

State v. Stone

State v. Stone
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided February 1, 2006 · Edmonds, Linder, Wollheim
204 Or. App. 115; 129 P.3d 210; 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 104

State v. Stone

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for harassment. On appeal, he argues that the trial court should have granted his motion for a judgment of acquittal. We reject that argument without discussion. Defendant also argues that the trial court, in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights, admitted testimonial hearsay statements. The state concedes that the admission of those statements, over defendant’s objection, was erroneous under Crawford v. Washington, 541 US 36, 124 S Ct 1354, 158 L Ed 2d 177 (2004). We accept the state’s concession and agree that a new trial is required. Because we remand for a new trial on that basis, we do not consider defendant’s alternative arguments for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.