Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006

State v. Hamilton

State v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided March 22, 2006 · Armstrong, Haselton, Rosenblum
204 Or. App. 776; 131 P.3d 863; 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 341

State v. Hamilton

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is dangerous to others. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is dangerous to others. We find the state’s concession to be well founded and therefore accept it.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.