Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006

State v. Kiersey

State v. Kiersey
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided May 10, 2006 · Edmonds, Linder, Wollheim
205 Or. App. 671; 135 P.3d 392; 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 612

State v. Kiersey

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is presently a danger to herself or unable to take care of her own basic needs because of her mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.