Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006

State v. Magee

State v. Magee
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided September 6, 2006 · Edmonds, Linder, Wollheim
207 Or. App. 637; 142 P.3d 123; 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1339

State v. Magee

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of, among other offenses, one count of attempted burglary (with intent to commit harassment) and one count of attempted burglary (with intent to commit menacing). ORS 164.225; ORS 161.405. Defendant argues that the two attempted burglaries — both based on a single attempted entry — should have merged into a single conviction for attempted burglary. The state concedes that the trial court erred in failing to merge the convictions. State v. Barrett, 331 Or 27, 10 P3d 901 (2000). We agree and accept the concession.1

Reversed and remanded with instructions to merge convictions for attempted burglary and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Because we conclude that this error requires resentencing, we must remand the entire case for resentencing. ORS 138.222(5).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.