Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007

State v. A. S.

State v. A. S.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided May 16, 2007 · Edmonds, Sercombe, Wollheim
212 Or. App. 693; 159 P.3d 334; 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 693

State v. A. S.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to take care of her own basic needs because of her mental disorder. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.