Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007

State v. N. L.

State v. N. L.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided December 5, 2007 · No. 050766799 · Edmonds, Sercombe, Wollheim
216 Or. App. 445; 173 P.3d 1230; 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 1702
State v. N. L.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that, because of a mental disorder, she is unable to provide for her basic needs and is not receiving such care as is necessary for health or safety. See ORS 426.005(l)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.