In the Matter of Jc
In the Matter of Jc
Opinion
In the Matter of J.C., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
J.C., Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Liza Langford, Portland, filed the brief, for appellant.
Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Tiffany Keast, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief, for respondent.
Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and WOLLHEIM, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment recommitting her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.307. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to provide for her basic needs because of her mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state's concession and reverse.
Reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.