Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008

State v. S. L.

State v. S. L.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided September 3, 2008 · Edmonds, Sercombe, Wollheim
222 Or. App. 206; 192 P.3d 856; 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1151

State v. S. L.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing her as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is a danger to herself because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.