Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009

In the Matter of Ww

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided April 1, 2009 · Landau, Presiding Judge, and Schuman, Judge, and Ortega, Judge

205 P.3d 62; 227 Or. App. 279 (Pacific Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

205 P.3d 62 (2009)227 Or. App. 279

In the Matter of W.W., aka J.W., aka J.D., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
W.W., aka J.W., aka J. D., Appellant.

070970206; A137082.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted February 6, 2009.Decided April 1, 2009.

Daniel J. Casey filed the brief for appellant.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Rolf C. Moan, Acting Solicitor General, and Denis M. Vannier, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In this civil commitment case, the trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and, because of that disorder, is unable to provide for his basic needs. On appeal, appellant contends that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, we agree that the evidence is insufficient.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

In the Matter of Ww

Opinion

In the Matter of W.W., aka J.W., aka J.D., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.STATE of Oregon, Respondent,v.W.W., aka J.W., aka J. D., Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

In the Matter of W.W., aka J.W., aka J.D., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
W.W., aka J.W., aka J. D., Appellant.