State v. Day
State v. Day
205 P.3d 74; 227 Or. App. 288
(Pacific Reporter, Third Series)
State v. Day
Opinion
STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Danny Joe DAY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Garrett A. Richardson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Multnomah Defenders, Inc.
Karla H. Ferrall, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.
Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and ROSENBLUM, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Reversed. State v. Mack, 219 Or.App. 119, 183 P.3d 191, rev. den., 345 Or. 301, 194 P.3d 148 (2008).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.