Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009

State v. D. G.

State v. D. G.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided November 18, 2009 · Edmonds, Sercombe, Wollheim
232 Or. App. 210; 221 P.3d 801; 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1816

State v. D. G.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing Trim as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he is unable to provide for his basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(1)(d). The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.