Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010

State v. Webster

State v. Webster
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided December 15, 2010 · Schuman, Wollheim, Rosenblum
245 P.3d 172; 239 Or. App. 598; 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1631 (Pacific Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Webster

Opinion

*599 PER CURIAM

Following a trial to the court on stipulated facts, defendant was convicted of driving while suspended. ORS 811.182. He appeals and asserts, among other things, that the trial court erred when it held a bench trial in the absence of a written waiver of his right to a jury trial. Although defendant did not preserve the asserted error before the trial court, he contends that we should review it as plain error. Because the record contains no written waiver or any other indication that defendant executed such a waiver, the state concedes that the trial court committed plain error. See Or Const, Art I, § 11; State v. Barber, 343 Or 525, 173 P3d 827 (2007) (reversing as plain error a conviction based on a stipulated facts trial conducted by the court without a written waiver of the defendant’s right to jury trial). We agree and, for the reasons set forth in Barber, exercise our discretion to correct the error. Accordingly, defendant’s conviction must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.