Defendant appeals, challenging convictions following a jury trial on three counts of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.405; three counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427; one count of private indecency, ORS 163.467; and three counts of endangering the welfare of a minor, ORS 163.575. He assigns error to the trial court’s admission, over his objection, of evidence of a nurse practitioner’s diagnosis, made in the absence of any physical evidence, that the victim had been sexually abused.

On appeal, defendant contends, in part, that, pursuant to State v. Southard, 347 Or 127, 218 P3d 104 (2009), the trial court’s admission of the diagnosis was reversible error. 1 The state concedes that, in light of Southard, “the trial court committed reversible error” in admitting that evidence. According to the state, “[t]he proper remedy is to reverse defendant’s convictions and remand for a new trial.” The state’s concession is well founded, and, accordingly, we accept it. Thus, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.