Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011

State v. A. S.

State v. A. S.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided February 16, 2011 · Armstrong, Duncan, Haselton
240 Or. App. 809; 247 P.3d 1278; 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 166

State v. A. S.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals an order committing her to the Mental Health Division for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. At the commitment hearing, the court indicated that “there is clear and convincing evidence in my mind that [appellant] will not soon be able to safely survive by meeting her basic needs if she is discharged.” On appeal, we review the record to determine whether there is legally sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s determination. A discussion of the facts would not benefit the bench, the bar, or the public. The state concedes that the evidence in the record is legally insufficient to support the court’s determination. We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.