Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2012

State v. M. K.

State v. M. K.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Decided June 20, 2012 · Nakamoto, Schuman, Wollheim
250 Or. App. 564; 280 P.3d 1064; 2012 WL 2344451; 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 776

State v. M. K.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellant was committed as a mentally ill person for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that she is unable to meet her own basic needs because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.005(l)(e). The state concedes that the evidence is legally insufficient to support an order of involuntary commitment. We agree, accept the state’s concession, and reverse.

Reversed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.